Voters split tickets, demand gridlock, compromise

The big news from the Wisconsin elections Tuesday: Gov. Walker is out; gridlock is in.

Badger State voters waited in record numbers in long lines in a light rain to send a mixed message about where they want the state to go in the next four years. They narrowly voted in Democrat Tony Evers, but also voted to give the Republicans decisive wins in the state Senate and Assembly.

They also voted out Republican Attorney General Brad Schimel to give Democrat Josh Kaul a narrow win. Lt. Gov. Rebecca is out of office as part of the Walker team in favor of Mandela Barnes.

So, the state will see highly divided government starting in January. The Republican Party will control the state senate with a 19-14 majority, adding to its margin by one seat, and the assembly by the same wide margin of 64-35 that it held prior to the election. The Democrats will control the governor’s and AG offices.

The agenda of the two parties are markedly different, so the bet has to be that not much will get done in Evers’ four-year term. Both sides will have to forget about policies where they have deep disagreement, but may be able to finds areas of compromise.

The areas ripe for compromise are funding for accelerated road work, support for K-12 and university education and coverage of pre-existing conditions in health care. Leaders from both parties have expressed support in those arenas.

One take on the Tuesday elections is that the voters were screaming for compromise. They were saying: “We are going to force you to work together even if you don’t like it.”

Compromise is a good thing in politics, because it enables policy advancements that both parties can live with and therefore the general populace can accept. Compromise binds.

Stoked by President Trump, the hallmark of today’s politics is divisiveness. An antidote to that rancor is ticket splitting, and that clearly happened here Tuesday in a big way. Election analysts will find that out as they dig into the numbers in coming weeks.

Other areas where the two parties might be able to work together are big issues that got little or no attention in the hard-fought, sometimes nasty campaigns. That would include the need to reorganize the University of Wisconsin System on a regional basis, more work on the opiod crisis, added stimulus for entrepreneurs and the burgeoning startup ecosystem that are reinventing the rust belt, the recipe for poverty in the extremely high rate of births to single mothers, the labor shortages and many more.

In short, there are plenty of issues on which Evers can work with Assembly Speaker Robin Vos and Senate Majority Leader Scott Fitzgerald. I bet they are already talking.

If they choose instead to push divisive issues, like school choice, Act 10, the Foxconn subsidies, abortion and tax cuts or hikes, they will just cancel each other out.

My guess, given the voters’ elevated level disgust with excessive partisanship, is that the party that is the least compromising will be the party that loses the most in the 2020 elections.

Of course, the biggest question in the aftermath of the national mid-term elections is what impact did President Trump have on the outcomes. The spin machines will be working in high RPMs so we will have to sort through a lot of political hoo-ha.

The one clear telltale in Wisconsin is the reelection of liberal U.S. Sen. Tammy Baldwin by a very wide margin over conservative Leah Vukmir. State Sen. Vukmir tied herself to Trump with Superglue, and she got clobbered.

In reality, she had little choice because her opponent in the GOP primary had tied himself even tighter to the president. Trump’s shadow hangs heavy over the GOP, if not the nation as a whole.

Despite having his hands tied, the president will explain away the loss of the House of Representatives by asserting that it is normal for the party out of power to gain seats in off-year elections. Needing someone to throw under the bus, It was Pail Ruan’s fault, not his. But a loss is a loss. And gridlock will ensue on the national level as well the Wisconsin level.

That appears to be what the state and national voters want.

This entry was posted in Good government. Bookmark the permalink.
  • Michael Holloway

    might it be reasonably fair to say the new Governor and A.G. were elected – or had a better chance of being elected – because they are not part of gerrymandered districts? my opinion, it played a role. in 2020 the state needs to look at a new method of redistricting attempting to make it as political neutral as possible.

  • I totally agree with Michael Holloway. Voters did not choose gridlock: they chose change from the extreme partisanship, corruption and oligarchic nature of the Walker/Fitzgerald/Vos triumvirate. It is only because of radical gerrymandering that we have gridlock. Cause and effect are important. If Evers is smart, he’ll introduce a bill right out of the box to adopt a system of redistricting like Iowa’s that allows voters to chose their politicians rather than the KOCH/GOP approach of allowing politicians to chose their voters. Of course Vos and Fitzgerald will not go along, so then every Democratic campaign in 2020 should run on fair, competitive districts. Let’s leave oligarchy behind and re-establish democracy. Put another way, let voters rather than WMC chose our lawmakers and justices.

    • JohnTorinus

      It’s good to learn, Charlie, that only one side is hyper-partisan.

      • James Kerler

        One side is morbidly hyper-partisan, and bent on corrupting the democratic process.

        • Steve

          So Charlie does this mean the Democrats are not corrupt? Give me a break. All one needs to do is look what is happening in Florida. My guess is Charlie you want to go back to the Jim Doyle days of corruption.

  • Aubrey Berkowitz

    My guess, given the voters’ elevated level disgust with excessive partisanship, is that the party that is the least compromising will be the party that loses the most in the 2020 elections.